Biblical Guide to the Ultimate Moral Argument for Christians

The Moral Argument

The moral argument for the existence of God is based on the observation that all people recognize some moral code. We instinctively understand that certain things are right and others are wrong. When we argue over moral issues, we appeal to a higher law that we assume everyone is aware of and holds to. This higher law implies the existence of a lawgiver who establishes and upholds these moral standards. Ultimately, the moral argument suggests that God is the universal lawgiver who provides the foundation for morality.

Recognizing a Universal Moral Code

One of the key points supporting the moral argument is that even remote tribes, cut off from the rest of civilization, observe a moral code similar to everyone else’s. While differences may exist in civil matters, virtues like bravery and loyalty and vices like greed and cowardice are universally recognized. If this moral code were solely a human invention, it would vary greatly among different cultures. However, the existence of a universal moral code suggests that it transcends humanity and points to a universal lawgiver, namely God.

The Source of Moral Ideas

Another aspect of the moral argument relates to where our ideas of what should be done come from. Rarely do people live up to their own moral code, indicating that there is a standard higher than ourselves. Romans 2:14-15 in the Bible speaks of the moral law or conscience coming from an ultimate lawgiver above mankind. This aligns with our observation that there is a common understanding of right and wrong across different cultures and societies. It suggests that our moral ideas are derived from a source beyond ourselves, which can be attributed to God.

Think About It:

Consider how different cultures and societies may have varying laws and customs regarding civil matters, but still recognize universal virtues and vices. Reflect on why there exists a common understanding of right and wrong despite these differences.

The Role of Atheism

The moral argument also challenges atheism by highlighting that it provides no objective basis for morality, hope, or meaning in life. Without God, there would be no foundation for moral standards and values. Our understanding of right and wrong would be subjective and arbitrary, varying from person to person. However, the existence of objective moral values and duties, as well as the universal recognition of a moral code, points to the existence of God as the ultimate lawgiver.

Why This Matters:

The moral argument is significant because it demonstrates that faith in God provides a solid foundation for morality. It suggests that our moral intuitions align with the existence of a higher lawgiver who has established objective moral standards. Acknowledging God’s role in morality helps us understand the importance of living according to these standards and seeking His guidance in making ethical decisions.

In conclusion, the moral argument asserts that the existence of a universal moral code implies the existence of a universal lawgiver, namely God. The observation that even remote tribes recognize common virtues and vices supports this argument. Additionally, our ideas of what should be done, despite our inability to consistently live up to them, suggest the presence of a higher standard beyond ourselves. Atheism fails to provide an objective basis for morality, hope, and meaning in life. The moral argument highlights the importance of acknowledging God as the ultimate lawgiver and living in accordance with His moral standards. By recognizing God’s role in morality, we can better navigate ethical dilemmas and strive to live righteous lives.